|
Even before the pandemic. The problem of staying in virtual space was relevant. But now it is even more serious. Additionally. environment that may exacerbate the problem of digital dependency. But a person. Being a socialized subject. Needs contact with reality. Communication with others. And active participation in reality. Although the metaverse is able to fuel the activity of some participants through games and sports. It cannot replace their needs in the real world. Misplaced priorities on humanity's part the second aspect that draws criticism is related to the wrong priorities that society and humanity often show in relation to metaverses.
Keza mcdonald. Author of the article "I've seen the metaverse – and I don't want it" in the guardian. Describes their future growth as a capitalist technocratic hell. What is a browser and how does it work read also what is a browser and how does it Benin WhatsApp Number work more details he believes that the virtual metaverse is not a solution to such global problems as sexism. Homophobia. Racial hatred and other vices that humanity faces. There is even a problem of harassment. Keza mcdonald argues that people inspired by mark zuckerberg will turn metaverses into an inexhaustible source of income that brings no real benefit to humanity.
He draws attention to the fact that some people spend a lot of money on nfts and strive to leave the real world and live in the digital space. At the same time. The present is on the verge of disaster. The rapid development of metauniverses is leading society away from solving pressing problems. Criticism of metaverses criticism of the metaverse potential cyber dictatorship the third reason for criticism of metaverses relates to the potential for cyber dictatorship. Many visionaries believe that state apparatuses and large monopolies are seeking to make maximum use of the development of digitalization of society to supervise people.
| 
發表於 2024-3-12 12:43:21